On Taylor Swift’s Feminist Reputation


Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






By Simran P. Gupta

Staff Writer

As Taylor Swift shifted from country music to pop, her public image became more concerned with feminism and empowerment. The more I observe her public persona and how she uses her platform, as a woman of color, I cannot see her as the feminist, empowering figure she is trying to establish.

Taylor-Swift-reputation-ART-2017-billboard-1240

“Reputation” album cover. Source: Billboard

“Look What You Made Me Do” and its music video dropped in late August. Thus enters Taylor Swift reborn, with darker and edgier imagery, music, and lyrics. Much like “Bad Blood” or “Blank Space” on her previous album “1989,” this is Swift’s power track, meant to take back a narrative that has gone out of control and beat the media at its own game. Once again, however, she falls short.

Rather than an empowering anthem, lyrics such as “I got a list of names/and your’s is in red, underlined” read as revenge-focused and petty. The line “I don’t like your kingdom keys/ They once belonged to me” reads oddly considering she is a self-proclaimed feminist. In fact, it reeks of entitlement. The imagery in her music video reads the same: in one shot, her car smashes into a pole with her Grammy in the seat next to her. She wears a wig strikingly similar to Katy Perry’s hair, reading as a jab at Perry’s career and lack of Grammy awards. In fact, Swift released all of her music back onto Spotify the same day Perry released her album.

Beyond the farce of a new era for Swift, her use of her platform does not read as particularly feminist or empowering. Her song “Shake it Off” was highly appropriative. She has remained tight lipped about issues that concern black women and women of color, such as police brutality, xenophobia, and islamophobia. She recently found herself in opposition to the ACLU after she sent a cease-and-desist letter to a blogger who linked one of her singles to the growing neo-nazi sentiment in the U.S. Swift claimed the post was defamatory, and the ACLU protected the blogger. She has remained silent on the matter- a missed opportunity to take control of the narrative.

But this issue connects to larger questions at hand: why won’t Swift denounce white supremacy and neo-nazism? She could easily verbally distance herself from neo-nazis who claim her as their “aryan princess” and co-opt her song “Look What You Made Me Do.” Her platform is huge, rivaled only by mega-stars like Beyoncé. Swift could have made a difference in an election that saw 40 percent of white women vote for Donald Trump, had she only spoken up. On the one hand, no one is obligated to endorse a certain candidate or share who they voted for. But Swift could have used her platform to call attention to how harmful Trump is to women of all intersecting identities without simultaneously endorsing another candidate.

Some may argue that this isn’t her responsibility, but being a self-proclaimed feminist means more than only looking out for white women. She won’t risk hurting album sales or losing fans by overtly feminist content, other than something entirely whitewashed. She loves her fans, and invites them for early listening parties at her various residences, yet her monetary tactics only perpetuate a class hierarchy among them. Her new album is off of streaming sites indefinitely, which means the only way to listen to “Reputation” is to get the CD or buy it from iTunes. Her “Taylor Swift Tix” program requires fans to buy thirteen copies of her album, or upwards of $50 of merchandise to increase their chances of getting a ticket.

Taylor Swift’s brand of feminism is exclusionary and falls short of being empowering in the era of Kesha’s “Praying” and Beyoncé’s “Lemonade.”